• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Reviewers
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 8 (2021)
Volume Volume 7 (2020)
Volume Volume 6 (2019)
Volume Volume 5 (2018)
Volume Volume 4 (2017)
Volume Volume 3 (2016)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
EL Said, A., Shoriebah, E., EL Kilany, N. (2016). Evaluation of Nano- Hydroxyapatite versus Hydroxyapatite Crystals in the Treatment of Periodontal Intrabony Defects. Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls, 3(3), 201-208. doi: 10.21608/adjg.2016.5088
Amal EL Said; Eatemad Shoriebah; Naglaa EL Kilany. "Evaluation of Nano- Hydroxyapatite versus Hydroxyapatite Crystals in the Treatment of Periodontal Intrabony Defects". Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls, 3, 3, 2016, 201-208. doi: 10.21608/adjg.2016.5088
EL Said, A., Shoriebah, E., EL Kilany, N. (2016). 'Evaluation of Nano- Hydroxyapatite versus Hydroxyapatite Crystals in the Treatment of Periodontal Intrabony Defects', Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls, 3(3), pp. 201-208. doi: 10.21608/adjg.2016.5088
EL Said, A., Shoriebah, E., EL Kilany, N. Evaluation of Nano- Hydroxyapatite versus Hydroxyapatite Crystals in the Treatment of Periodontal Intrabony Defects. Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls, 2016; 3(3): 201-208. doi: 10.21608/adjg.2016.5088

Evaluation of Nano- Hydroxyapatite versus Hydroxyapatite Crystals in the Treatment of Periodontal Intrabony Defects

Article 6, Volume 3, Issue 3, July 2016, Page 201-208  XML PDF (450.58 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/adjg.2016.5088
Authors
Amal EL Said1; Eatemad Shoriebah2; Naglaa EL Kilany3
1Demonstrator in Department of Oral Medicine, Periodontology,Oral Diagnosis and Dental Radiology Faculty of Dental Medicine Al-Azhar University, (Girls Branch)
2Professor of Oral Medicine, periodontology, Oral Diagnosis and Dental Radiology Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine Al-Azhar University, (Girls Branch)
3Assistant Professor of Oral Medicine, Periodontology, Oral Diagnosis and Dental Radiology Department,Faculty of Dental Medicine Al- Azhar University, (Girls Branch)
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to evaluate clinically and radiographically the
effectiveness of nano-crystalline hydroxyapatite (NcHA) versus hydroxyapatite (HA)
crystals in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects. Subjects and Methods:
Twelve patients with bilateral defects, with probing depth (PD) ≥5 mm and clinical
attachment loss (CAL) ≥3 mm participated in the present study. Subjects were divided
randomly into Group 1: 12 sites treated surgically with open flap debridement (OFD)
and placement of NcHA (1) as a bone substitute. Group 2: 12 sites treated surgically
with open flap debridement and placement of HA (2) as a bone substitute. The following
clinical parameters were recorded: PD, CAL, plaque index (PI), gingival index
(GI), alveolar bone level percentage and bone density percentage. Results: At 6 months
following therapy, PD and CAL decreased by time, with a statistically significant difference
in both groups .On comparison of the mean difference in PD and CAL between the
two groups after Mann-Whitney U test was applied at baseline, 3 and 6 months, scores
were found to be statistically non-significant (p>0.01). A significant reduction in PI and
GI were recorded following therapy. As regard to radiographic bone measurements,
in both groups, alveolar bone level percent decreased by time, with a non-significant
difference. The change occurring in the first interval was greater in both groups, with a
non-significant difference. In both groups, bone density percent increased by time, with
a significant difference. The change occurring in the second interval was greater in both
groups, with a non-significant difference between changes occurring in both intervals.
Conclusion: Both NcHA and conventional HA led to the improvement of clinical and
radiographic parameters over the course of the study. The NcHA group did not show
any significant improvement over the HA group.
Statistics
Article View: 96
PDF Download: 161
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.