Cozza P, Baccett Ti, Franchi L, De Toffol L and McNamara JA. Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: A systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006; 129:1-12.
2. Proffit WR, Fields HW and Sarver DM. Orthodontic treatment planning: limitations, controversies and special problems. In: Contemporary Orthodontics. St. Louis: Mosby, 2007: 296-297.
3. Dolce C, Mansour DA, McGorray SP and Wheelerd TT. Intrarater agreement about the etiology of Class II malocclusion and treatment approach. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2012; 141:17-23.
4. Cassidy SE, Jackson SR, Turpin DL, Ramsay DS, Spiekerman C and Huang GJ. Classification and treatment of Class II subdivision malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2014; 145: 443- 451.
5. Spalding P. Treatment of class II malocclusions. In: Bishara S. Textbook of orthodontics. St. Louis: WB Saunders, 2001: 351-352.
6. Papadopoulos MA. Non-compliance approaches for management of class II malocclusion. In: Skeletal Anchorage in Orthodontic Treatment of Class II Malocclusion: contemporary applications of orthodontic implants, miniscrew implants and miniplates. St. Louis: Mosby, 2015: 6-11.
7. Singh VP, Pokhrael PR, Pariekh K, Roy DK, Singla A and Biswas KP. Elastics in orthodontics: a review. Health Renaiss. 2012; 10: 49-56.
8. Tsarudis CS and Pancherz H. “Effective” TMJ and chin position changes in Class II treatment. Angle Orthod. 2008; 78: 813-818.
9. Yildirim E and Karacay S. Comparison of dentofacial effect of the Eureka Spring and intermaxillary elastics in the treatment of Class II malocclusion. Gulhane Med J. 2015; 57: 284-289.
10. Pithon MM, Mendes JL, Silva CA, Santos RL and Coqueiro RS. Force decay of latex and non-latex intermaxillary elastics: a clinical study. Eur J Orthod. 2016;38:39-43.
11. Borges JC, Gallo DB, Santana RM, Filho OG, Camargo ES and Tanaka OM. Influence of different beverages on the force degradation of intermaxillary elastics: an in vitro study. J Appl Oral Sci. 2013; 21: 145-149.
12. Santos RL, Pithon MM, Martins FO, Romanos MTV and Ruellas ACO. Cytotoxicity of the latex and non- latex orthodontic elastomeric ligatures on L929 mouse fibroblasts. Braz Dent J. 2010; 21: 205-210.
13. Colomer SM, Hernandez PG, Romano FL, De Rossi A, Fukada SY, Filho PN, Consolaro A, Silva RAB and Silva LAB. Latex and non-latex orthodontic elastics: in vitro and in vivo evaluations of tissue compatibility and surface structure. Angle Orthod. 2016; 86: 278-284.
14. Pires BU, Souza RE, Filho MV, Degan VV, Santos JCB and Tubel CAM. Force degradation of different elastomeric chains and nickel titanium closed springs. Braz J Oral Sci. 2011; 10:167-170.
15. Chaudhari CV and Tarvade SM. Comparison of rate of retraction and anchorage loss using nickel titanium closed coil springs and elastomeric chain during the en-masse retraction: a clinical study. J Orthod Res. 2015; 3:129- 133.
16. Papadopoulos MA. Orthodontic Treatment of the Class II Non-compliant Patient: Current Principles and Techniques. Edingurgh: Mosby, 2006: 26.
Mcsherry PF and Bradley H. Class II correction-reducing patient compliance: a review of the available techniques. J Orthod. 2000; 27: 219-225.
18. Vanlaecken R, Williams MO, Razmus T, Gunel E, Martin C and Ngan P. Class III correction using an inter-arch spring-loaded module. Prog Orthod. 2014; 15:1-11.
19. Lombardo L, Carlucci A, Cervinara F and Siciliani G.A new, non-compliance Class II correction strategy using nickeltitanium coilsprings.J World Fed Orthod.2015;4:40-49.
20. Southard TS, Marshall SD, Allareddy V, Uribe LMM and Holton NE. An evidence- based comparison of headgear and functional appliance therapy for the correction of Class II malocclusions. Semin Orthod. 2013; 19: 174–195.
21. Littlewood SJ. Functional appliances. In: Mitchell L, An Introduction to Orthodontics. United Kingdom: Oxford, 2013:248-249.
22. Nanda R and Kapila S. Current Therapy in Orthodontics. 1st edition. St.Louis: Mosby; 2010: 103–114.
23. Ritto AK and Ferreira AP. Fixed functional appliances- A classification. Funct Orthod. 2000; 17: 12-30.
24. McNamara JA and Howe RP. Clinical management of the acrylic splint Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1988; 94:142-149.
25. Barnetta GA, Higginsb DW, Majorc PW and Mird CF. Immediate skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of the crown- or banded type Herbst appliance on class II division 1 malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2008; 78: 361-369.
26. Baysal A and Uysal T. Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy. Eur J Orthod.2014; 36:164-172.
27. Manni A, Pasini M, Mazzotta L, Mutinelli S, Nuzzo C, Grassi FR and Cozzani M. Comparison between an acrylic splint Herbst and an acrylic splint miniscew-Herbst for mandibular incisor proclination control. Int J Dent. 2014;1-7.
28. Al-Jewair TS, Preston C. B, Moll EM and Dischinger T. A comparison of the MARA and the Advansync functional appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2012; 82: 907–914.
29. Jayachandran S, Wiltshire WA, Hayasaki SM and Pinheiro FHSL. Comparison of Advansync and intermaxillary elastics in the correction of Class II malocclusions: A retrospective clinical study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2016; 150: 979-988.
30. Ateia HA: Evaluation of the role of Advansync appliance in treatment of class II division 1 malocclusion. Master thesis, AL-Azhar University Girls’ Branch, Egypt 2013.
31. Atik E, Guven BA and Kocadereli I. Soft tissue effects of three different Class II/1- camouflage treatment strategies. J Orofac Orthop. 2017; 78:153-165.
32. Nishanth B, Gopinath A, Ahmed S, Patil N, Srinivas K and Chaitanya A. Cephalometric and computed tomography evaluation of dentoalveolar/soft-tissue change and alteration in condyle-glenoid fossa relationship using the Power Scope: A new fixed functional appliance for Class II correction- A clinical study.Int JOrthod Rehabil.2017; 8:41-50